The very first step is to download and install HandBrake for Mac or Windows and then launch it. Secondly, you will be displayed with the interface where you will find the Source button at the top. Click it and select the Video File option.Adobe categorizes the update as “critical”, and recommends that users update their installations to the newest versions at once. And here’s why.OS X Yosemite 10.10.3. HandBrake is available for multiple operating systems, thereby allowing seamless cross-platform usage. For Mac, it is recommended to have Mac OS 10.11 and above.OS X Yosemite v10.10.3 g&252 ncellemesi yeni Fotoraflar uygulamas i&231 erir ve Mac According to the Photoshop-maker, Adobe Flash Player 10.3.183.7 and earlier versions for Macintosh, Windows, Linux and Solaris operating systems have “critical vulnerabilities could cause a crash and potentially allow an attacker to take control of the affected system.”On Android-powered devices, Adobe Flash Player 10.3.186.6 and earlier versions are also affected.Adobe did some research and discovered that “There are reports that one of these vulnerabilities (CVE-2011-2444) is being exploited in the wild in active targeted attacks designed to trick the user into clicking on a malicious link delivered in an email message.”Hence their decision to label the issue as “critical”.“This universal cross-site scripting issue could be used to take actions on a user's behalf on any website or webmail provider if the user visits a malicious website,” the company adds.The natural resolution, of course, is to update to the latest version of Flash. Adobe breaks it down by platform in the lines to follow:“Adobe recommends users of Adobe Flash Player 10.3.183.7 and earlier versions for Windows, Macintosh, Linux and Solaris update to Adobe Flash Player 10.3.183.10,” reads their security bulletin.“Users of Adobe Flash Player for Android 10.3.186.6 and earlier versions should update to Adobe Flash Player for Android 10.3.186.7,” Adobe outlines.Mac users can grab the latest Flash version using the link below. The follow-up page featuring Final Cut Pro X, Motion, and Photoshop CC as well as four games.Adobe Systems Inc.
Handbrake 10.10.3 Install HandBrake ForSo, no image quality determinations were made.What’s the fastest compression software? Well, that depends… While this does not yield the smallest file sizes, a 10 mbps bit rate will yield excellent image quality in all cases. This article compares the speed between a new Mac Pro, a 21″ iMac and a 15″ MacBook Pro using Apple Compressor 4.2.This test used the same YouTube compression setting for all systems and all tests, or as close as each software would allow. This article examines image quality in the latest version of Compressor 4.2 when compressing files using the H.264 codec. This article compares the compression speed between Compressor 4.1.2 and Compressor 4.2. This week, in my continuing series looking at video compression software, I want to compare the compression speeds of six different software when encoding files for YouTube using a new Mac Pro and a 21″ iMac.The software I used were the current versions as of today:We used the trial versions of both Telestream Episode and Sorenson Squeeze for this test.Here are the other articles in this series: In 1-pass mode it was reasonably fast, but 2-pass mode was unstable. I suspect that it would be even faster running on a top-of-the-line Mac Pro.The latest version of Compressor is the fastest version yet, though running it in multiple instance mode caused some 2-pass compression jobs to fail.Adobe Media Encoder was a solid contender, ranked third for speed in almost all tests.MPEG Streamclip was problematic. If you own an iMac or MacBook Pro, Apple Compressor is fastest, with HandBrake second.HandBrake seems to take fullest advantage of the Mac Pro architecture. However, if you need to add watermarks or other effects, Apple Compressor is a better choice with Adobe Media Encoder a solid runner up.Click here to download a PDF of all my findings so you can check my math.BIG NOTE: Within the next few weeks Adobe is releasing a new version of Adobe Media Encoder. I strongly recommend against using 2-pass mode in MPEG Streamclip.I was surprised that both Episode and Squeeze were slower than average on both systems.If you want pure speed, pick HandBrake. In both cases, I canceled the compression. Past tests also included a 15″ MacBook Pro. I don’t recommend using this feature. Compressor can process multiple files at the same time when multiple instances are turned on. A 27″ iMac will have speeds comparable to the 21″ iMac. It will not be as fast as the two units I tested. Sadly, there just wasn’t time. I have been asked to run these tests on an older Mac Pro. Based on past experience, I would expect the laptop to match the iMac speeds give or take about 5%. Download golf games for macTwo clips had native 720p images. I tested clips using three different codecs: XDCAM EX, ProRes 422 HQ and ProRes 4444. The new laptop has blazing hard disk speeds, which are of limited use in video compression.Clips. The brand-new MacBook Pro will have speeds similar to the iMac. I tested both 1-pass and 2-pass VBR, with a standardized bit rate of 10,000 kbps for both applications. Compressor defaults to a 2-pass VBR with a 9765 kbps bit rate. AME defaults to 1-pass VBR with a 16 mbps bit rate. All source clips were stored on the internal drive, which yields the fastest results on SSD systems.Compression settings. Clip durations ranged from 4 minutes to 48 minutes. I configured a compression setting to match our tests. Keyframes,when they could be set, were set to 90.Compressor was restarted when I changed the number of instances.HandBrake and MPEG Streamclip did not have YouTube presets. Max and Min settings in AME were identical at 10. Clips compressed individually, no two clips compressed at the same time. Only one setting was applied to each clip. No other apps were running during compression. All YouTube default settings in all software that had them, looked like they would create excellent images without any additional tweaks.Compression times were reported by the application. It easily compressed all three of the test codecs. I was surprised at how fast HandBrake was. File sizes were consistent across all applications the only exception was Adobe Media Encoder in 1-pass mode which generated quite large files. Red bars indicate the slowest. Green bars indicate the fastest results in each category. Why Sorenson Squeeze was faster in 2-pass mode than 1-pass I have no idea. 2-pass compression took longer in every case but one. (Though CPU loading is not be the only indicator of software compression speed.) Even more important, at data rates of 10,000 kbps which we used for this test, image quality should be fine for YouTube, regardless of whether you select 1-pass or 2-pass. MPEG Streamclip failed multiple times in 2-pass mode on both systems. There was no immediately obvious trend. Some files were bigger, some smaller. Based on what I see here, that is no longer true. The rule has been: 1-pass for speed and 2-pass for smaller compressed files and higher quality. For completeness, I also averaged compression times, but the results were the same as you would expect.The horsepower of the MacPro enabled applications that did not take advantage of hardware compression to do well: HandBrake, MPEG Streamclip, Episode and Squeeze.Compressor, which accesses both hardware and GPU compression, handily beat the Mac Pro for all but the 2-pass multiple instance test. The next section allows you to compare speeds between systems.I calculated this section by totaling compression times for all four movies compressed on each system (Total Time). Numbers higher than 100% are slower than AME, while numbers lower than 100% are faster.You can NOT compare Mac Pro speeds to iMac speeds in this section, as they use different numbers. (AME defaults to 16,000 kbps.)Because Adobe Media Encoder has, for the last year or so, been the fastest software out there, for this first test I set AME 1-pass equal to 100% and compared all the other software to it. Adobe Media Encoder is no slouch, easily beating Episode and Squeeze. Compressor is fast, with more features than HandBrake. This illustrates the differences in compression speed between software.( Click here to download a 4-page PDF detailing all my findings, so you can check my math.)Running this test took almost four days and I’m grateful to Brianna Murphy for her help in compiling these results. Compressor, for instance, compressed one minute of ProRes 4444 in under ten seconds, while XDCAM EX took Compressor more than 4 minutes.This compares compression speed by software for each system standardizing on ProRes 422 HQ. This averages both the MacPro and iMac numbers.What surprised me was the variability between codecs and software. If you have standardized on a particular codec, it worth while doing a test to see which software compresses your codec the fastest there are a lot of variations. However, the benefits of the built-in hardware acceleration of the iMac and MacBook Pro are so strong, I expect other vendors to add it in the near future.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorBarbara ArchivesCategories |